How Accurate Is The Vedic Astrology Methodology?

January 12, 2018 in Vedic Astrology

The prediction part is still dependent on Intuition, Experience, knowledge and the technique used by the Astrologer, due to which it is subjective, not repetitive and verifiable.Transit effects of planets are not in tune with the Birth chart prediction.Remedies are not based on Time, Place, Energy, Conscience and God. Old ways of Tantra, Mantra, Yantra and Puja is followed, which are not effective, a make-believe process, where many gullible are swindled by YouTube flimsy Astrologers. I have proof of a person swindled for 3 lakh rupees, with top names involved. Some use modern behavioral change style of remedy which will not correct the bad karma.

Still Vargas and NadiAmsas are not exploited fully by vedic astrologers. Due to which none of the astrologers are able to predict properly that aspect of life from Lagna or Amsa chart.Vimshottari Dasha is not properly interpreted to time events. This is again a great fallacy. Due to which timing is in a generic way.Some use a percentile effect of planets in each adjacent house, and percentile Dasha time for different houses, which is a make believe mumbo-jumbo style of analysis. No event timing is given, just some astrological axioms are quoted, and when a particular yoga or event will happen is not told.

Added to which Astrologers use reverse-proof to claim from astrological text, and prove their reading is correct. One such is, a prominent person horoscope is taken, and each event happened, they ascribe to their own type of interpretation and claim that, that it is the best. Added to these things software generated answers and reports are cut-and-paste type predictions which is inaccurate and stupid. Vedic Astrology as of now is accurate in telling about yoga’s (events) in a chart.I had researched Vargas (Amsas) and NadiAmsa with Vimshottari Dasha, found a technique for predicting accurately.Clearly, those of us who love astronomy cannot just hope that the public’s infatuation with astrology will go away. We must speak out whenever it is useful or appropriate – to discuss the shortcomings of astrology and the shaky ground it is based on.

Those of us working with youngsters can use these ideas to develop a healthy skepticism in the students and encourage an interest in the real cosmos – the one of remote worlds and suns that are mercifully unconcerned with the lives and desires of the creatures on planet Earth. Let’s not allow another generation of young people to grow up tied to an ancient fantasy, left over from a time when we huddled by the firelight, afraid of the night.To overcome the objections of astrologers who feel that the Sun sign alone is not enough for a reading, physicist Shawn Carlson of the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory carried out an ingenious experiment.

Groups of volunteers were asked to provide information necessary for casting a full horoscope and to fill out the California Personality Inventory, a standard psychologists’ questionnaire that uses just the sorts of broad, general, descriptive terms astrologers use. A “respected” astrological organization constructed horoscopes for the volunteers, and 28 professional astrologers who had approved the procedure in advance were each sent one horoscope and three personality profiles, one of which belonged to the subject of the horoscope. Their task was to interpret the horoscope and select which of the three profiles it matched.